Skip to content

    Navigation breadcrumbs

  1. Home
  2. Veterinary topics and resources
  3. All resources
  4. The risk from SARS‐CoV‐2 to bat species in England and mitigation options for conservation field workers

Library and information services

Access to electronic and print resources focused on veterinary science and animal health and services to support your study and keep up to date with clinical research.

Awards and prizes

Our awards celebrate achievements and build knowledge that contributes to evidence-based veterinary medicine.

History

We hold a unique collection of books, archives, artefacts and memorabilia which together offer an insight into the evolution of the British veterinary profession.

    Navigation breadcrumbs

  1. Home
  2. Veterinary topics and resources
  3. All resources
  4. The risk from SARS‐CoV‐2 to bat species in England and mitigation options for conservation field workers
22 March 2021

The risk from SARS‐CoV‐2 to bat species in England and mitigation options for conservation field workers

spotlight topic: COVID-19 and animals

Epidemiological studies

The risk from SARS‐CoV‐2 to bat species in England and mitigation options for conservation field workers

Published 22 March 2021 Common, S.M. et al (2021) The risk from SARS‐CoV‐2 to bat species in England and mitigation options for conservation field workers. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14035 This paper reports on a qualitative disease risk analysis (DRA), undertaken to assess the risk of disease from SARS‐CoV‐2 to free‐living bats from fieldworkers carrying out bat conservation interventions and development activities in England. The probability of disease occurring and the magnitude of the possible consequences to bat populations were assessed and mitigation methods proposed. The disease risk assessment was carried out by staff from The Institute of Zoology and Natural England, according to the method described by the OIE.  Assessment was undertaken of the biological pathways that might permit bats to be exposed and infected with SARS‐CoV‐2, as well as the probability of exposure and infection occurring. The probability of exposure of bats to SARS‐CoV‐2 through fieldwork activities was estimated to range from negligible to high, depending on the proximity between bats and people during the activity. The likelihood of infection after exposure was estimated to be high and the probability of dissemination of the virus through bat populations medium. There is uncertainty in the pathogenicity of SARS‐CoV‐2 in bats, with the authors reporting that SARS‐CoV‐2 has been demonstrated experimentally to infect one species of bat, but another has been shown to be experimentally resistant. Therefore, although the likelihood of clinical disease occurring in infected bats was assessed as low there is some uncertainty in this risk estimation. The authors note that the disease risk analysis should be updated as information on the epidemiology of SARS‐CoV‐2 and related viruses in bats improves. The authors conclude that the probability of infection can be effectively reduced if fieldworkers follow routine government guidance, and minimum precautions have been set out in advice provided by DEFRA to Natural England and in addition follow strict biosecurity measures when contacting bats or possible fomites which may expose bats to the virus, including the use of disposable gloves, cloth face coverings, effective hand cleansing and appropriate disinfecting of equipment. Guidance Natural England (2020). COVID‐19 and interacting with wildlife for the purposes surveying and mitigation works Botto Nunez, G. et al (2020) IUCN SSC Bat Specialist Group (BSG) recommended Strategy for researchers to reduce the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from humans to bats