Skip to content

    Navigation breadcrumbs

  1. Home
  2. Veterinary topics and resources
  3. All resources
  4. rapid review of evidence of infection of pets and livestock

Library and information services

Access to electronic and print resources focused on veterinary science and animal health and services to support your study and keep up to date with clinical research.

Awards and prizes

Our awards celebrate achievements and build knowledge that contributes to evidence-based veterinary medicine.

History

We hold a unique collection of books, archives, artefacts and memorabilia which together offer an insight into the evolution of the British veterinary profession.

    Navigation breadcrumbs

  1. Home
  2. Veterinary topics and resources
  3. All resources
  4. rapid review of evidence of infection of pets and livestock
20 April 2020

rapid review of evidence of infection of pets and livestock

spotlight topic: COVID-19 and animals Reviews

A a rapid review of evidence of infection of pets and livestock with human-associated coronavirus diseases, SARS, MERS, and COVID-19, and evidence of the fomite potential of pets and livestock

Published 20 April 2020 | Updated 1 May 2020 O’Connor, A.M, Totton, S.C. and Sargeant, J.M. (2020) SYREAF The review looked at the evidence available to answer two questions Question 1: “What is the evidence that domestic animals (cats, ferrets, dogs, swine, cattle, sheep, goats, poultry, horses) can be infected with, or shed, the human-associated coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2, which are associated with the diseases, SARS, MERS, and COVID-19, respectively?” Question 2: “What is the evidence that domestic animals (cats, ferrets, dogs, swine, cattle, sheep, goats, poultry, horses) can act as a fomite for the human-associated coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS- CoV, and SARS-CoV-2, which are associated with the diseases, SARS, MERS, and COVID-19, respectively? The review includes case studies and early experimental and epidemiological studies as well as studies of related coronaviruses (SARS and MERS). They concluded that from the evidence reviewed (to 29th April 2020): The authors acknowledge that there are many questions unanswered and state that they see this as a living review which will be updated as new evidence becomes available. It should be noted that while this is described as a “systematic review”, this review of the published literature was undertaken rapidly in response to the current pandemic and has not been peer-reviewed.