Skip to content

    Navigation breadcrumbs

  1. Home
  2. Veterinary topics and resources
  3. All resources
  4. Incidence of and risk factors for surgical site infection following canine limb amputation

Library and information services

Access to electronic and print resources focused on veterinary science and animal health and services to support your study and keep up to date with clinical research.

Awards and prizes

Our awards celebrate achievements and build knowledge that contributes to evidence-based veterinary medicine.

History

We hold a unique collection of books, archives, artefacts and memorabilia which together offer an insight into the evolution of the British veterinary profession.

    Navigation breadcrumbs

  1. Home
  2. Veterinary topics and resources
  3. All resources
  4. Incidence of and risk factors for surgical site infection following canine limb amputation
Journal watch27 April 2022

Incidence of and risk factors for surgical site infection following canine limb amputation

Evidence-based veterinary medicineSmall animalsSurgery and anaesthesia

Author(s): A.R. Billas, J.A. Grimes, D.L. Hollenbeck, V.M. Dickerson, M.L. Wallace and C.W. Schmiedt
Published in: Veterinary Surgery
Date: April 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13762
Type of access: Requires membership/payment
(click for full article)

This article can be accessed via RCVS Knowledge Library Membership (click here).
Find out more about the benefits of our membership.

Our summary

Billas, A.R. et al. (2022) Incidence of and risk factors for surgical site infection following canine limb amputation. Veterinary Surgery, 50 (3), pp. 418- 425.

The objective of this retrospective study was to identify the prevalence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) and risk factors for SSI in dogs following limb amputation.

The medical records of two veterinary teaching hospitals in the US from 2012 to 2020 were reviewed for dogs that had thoracic or pelvic limb amputations with a minimum of 30 days postoperative follow-up and/or SSI diagnosed prior to 30 days follow-up. Data on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected, as well as the date of SSI diagnosis, infection characteristics, culture results if the dog had a bacterial infection, and the antibiotic administered.

Two hundred and forty-eight dogs were included in the study, from 62 breeds with a mean age of 7.7 ± 3.4 years. One hundred and fifty-five dogs (155/248) had forequarter amputation, 67/248 had coxofemoral disarticulation and 26/248 had transfemoral amputation. 238/248 of procedures were classified as clean.

The method of muscle transection were monopolar electrosurgery (160/248), sharp transection (90/248) and/or bipolar vessel sealing device (68/248), with some dogs having more than one method used.

Thirty-one dogs (31/248, 12.5%) developed an SSI of the amputation site, mean time until identification of an SSI was 11.2 days ± 6.2 days after surgery. Factors increasing the odds of SSI were muscle transection with a bipolar vessel sealing device (OR 2.5), a procedure classified as other than clean (OR 8.2) and indication for amputation of bacterial infection or trauma when compared to neoplasia (OR 5.7 and 4.5 respectively).

Limitations of the study related to the retrospective nature, with some information in the medical records incomplete or unclear. The fact that the dogs in the study were from referral hospitals could have introduced bias of more complex cases with a higher risk of infection. There was also a low number of recorded SSIs and amputation sites classified as contaminated or dirty.

Take home

The study provides some evidence of an association between the use of a bipolar sealing device for muscle transection and SSIs. Electrosurgery or sharp transection should therefore be considered over these devices to decrease the incidence of postoperative SSI post in canine limb amputations. Larger scale studies are encouraged.

Next steps

Receive journal watch by email

Subscribe to have the latest summaries sent to your inbox

Claim CPD credit for your reading

Reading and reflecting on articles can count towards your CPD, and we have a template to help you with the process