Skip to content

    Navigation breadcrumbs

  1. Home
  2. Veterinary topics and resources
  3. All resources
  4. EBVM Toolkit
  5. EBVM Toolkit 1: asking an answerable clinical question

Library and information services

Access to electronic and print resources focused on veterinary science and animal health and services to support your study and keep up to date with clinical research.

Awards and prizes

Our awards celebrate achievements and build knowledge that contributes to evidence-based veterinary medicine.

History

We hold a unique collection of books, archives, artefacts and memorabilia which together offer an insight into the evolution of the British veterinary profession.

    Navigation breadcrumbs

  1. Home
  2. Veterinary topics and resources
  3. All resources
  4. EBVM Toolkit
  5. EBVM Toolkit 1: asking an answerable clinical question

EBVM Toolkit 1: asking an answerable clinical question

There are five key steps to follow in EBVM. This page offers advice on how to carry out the first step.
Evidence-based veterinary medicine

The first step in searching for literature is to define your question, phrasing it in a way that it will help you find all relevant articles and reduce the chance of you leaving anything important out.

A well-formed answerable question will also make it relatively straightforward to identify appropriate search terms and to combine them in the search strategy.

One way of identifying the key concepts is to use the PICO method.

The PICO method

Population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO) is a common framework that can help you to formulate a clinical question. These components can help you think about the who, what, when, where and how of an evidence-based question.

You may not need to use every element of PICO – it depends on what you want to find out.

Consider the following questions:

Patient or population

Who is the relevant patient or population? Be as specific as possible e.g. puppies, geriatric patients, pregnant bitches, spaniels?

Intervention

How? What intervention are you interested in? What is the management strategy, diagnostic test or type of food, drug or surgical procedure that you are testing?

Comparison/control

What is the main alternative? Is there a control or alternative management strategy or intervention that you are particularly interested to compare? Sometimes, when you want to know if the intervention above is better than doing nothing, the comparator will be “no intervention”.

Outcome

What are you trying to achieve, measure, improve, effect? What are the patient-relevant consequences of the intervention? Be as clear as you can here.

Applying the PICO method

You can see how this works in the following example.

Scenario

A client says they have heard that neutering bitches reduces the risk of mammary tumours and asks you if there is any evidence to back up this claim.

Clinical question

Turning that scenario into an answerable question could look like this:

In adult bitches does neutering versus non-neutering reduce the risk of mammary tumours?1

Taking the key concepts from the question and transforming the question into PICO format would look like this:

PICO componentQuestion concept
Patient or populationadult bitches
Interventionneutering
Comparison/controlno intervention
Outcomemammary tumours

Download EBVM Toolkit 1

Read this toolkit in PDF format.

2 pages

325KB

References

  1. Adapted from Beauvais, W., Cardwell, J.M. and Brodbelt, D.C. (2012) The effect of neutering on the risk of mammary tumours in dogs – a systematic review.  Journal of Small Animal Practice, 53 (6), pp. 314-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01220.x